How did you use media technology in the construction of research, planning and evaluation stages?
Wednesday, 16 March 2016
Evaluation Question 4
This is our answer to the 4th evaluation question. This one is titled:
How did you use media technology in the construction of research, planning and evaluation stages?
How did you use media technology in the construction of research, planning and evaluation stages?
Tuesday, 15 March 2016
Evaluation Question 3
This is our answer to the 3rd evaluation question. This one is titled:
What have you learnt from your audience feedback?
What have you learnt from your audience feedback?
Monday, 14 March 2016
Evaluation Question 2
This is our answer to the 2nd evaluation question. This one is titled:
How effective is the combination of your main product and your ancillary tasks?
How effective is the combination of your main product and your ancillary tasks?
Thursday, 10 March 2016
Evaluation Question 1
This is our answer to the 1st evaluation question. This one is titled:
In what ways does your media product use, develop, or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
Below is my video of my answer:
In what ways does your media product use, develop, or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
Wednesday, 9 March 2016
Evaluation Question 4 PREP
How did you use media technology in the
construction of research, planning and evaluation stages?
PLANNING FOR POWERPOINT
----------------------------------------
To prepare to answer this question, I listed all the different types of media I used, and which marts of the project I used them in.
RESEARCH
•
For these stages, I knew that most of the media technologies we would be
using would not be as creative as with the planning and evaluation stages. This
is because the research mainly consisted of audience research (videos and
text), research into existing media products (such as music videos and
ancillary tasks, student and professional), and research into existing blogs to
obtain an idea on the kind of work that I would need to be doing. I used the
following media technologies in these stages:
•
Microsoft Word- this is a document making programme that allows people to
type anything onto a simple paper-like format.
•
Adobe Premiere Pro- this software is used to edit film clips together. It
is used on a range of levels from beginner to full professional film maker.
•
YouTube- this is a website entirely for short videos. It is full of music
videos, tv shows, and homemade videos.
•
Google- this is an internet search engine that can be used to search,
calculate, or shop.
•
Blogger- a private website-like page creator.
•
Survey Monkey- A public server creator to obtain a set of results.
PLANNING
•
For these stages, I used similar types of technologies as the planning
parts. This is because most of the planning involved looking at the research
that I had made and applying it to my own ideas to try and create the best
outcome for the target audience. I used the following media technologies in
these stages:
•
Microsoft Word- this is a document making
programme that allows people to type anything onto a simple paper-like format.
•
YouTube- this is a website entirely for
short videos. It is full of music videos, tv shows, and home made videos.
•
Blogger- a private website-like page
creator.
•
Adobe Premiere Pro- this software is used to edit film
clips together. It is used on a range of levels from beginner to full
professional film maker.
EVALUATION
•
When it came to the evaluation, I wanted to be as creative as I could by
exploring a range of editing techniques and media technologies. I used the
following media technologies in these stages:
•
Adobe Premiere Pro- this software is used to edit film
clips together. It is used on a range of levels from beginner to full
professional film maker.
•
Microsoft PowerPoint- this is a programme used to create
a slideshow of images, text, or video.
•
YouTube- this is a website entirely for
short videos. It is full of music videos, tv shows, and homemade videos.
Saturday, 5 March 2016
Evaluation Question 3 PREP
What have you learnt from your audience feedback?
PLANNING FOR VIDEO
----------------------------------------------
To prepare to answer this question as a group video, I have created this plan that me and the rest of the group will use as idea hinting for the video.
Below
is a list of the audience feedback we have received. These can all be talked
about in the evaluation and compared.
·
The idea
·
Rough Cut
·
Ancillary tasks
·
Final Cut
THE IDEA feedback
·
What do you expect to see in a music video for the song
Barbarian?
Vikings and battle scenes, maybe some shots of the band playing at the same time?
Battling and warriors with people playing the music as well
I would have people fighting and something related to history, with shields and swords etc.
Guitars and bands, maybe a story line involved to keep the audience interested but doesn't always have to be the case.
What
did we learn from this?
From this, we were able to compare our thoughts on what the video should feature compared to the thoughts of our target audience, to see how successfully we captured the essence of the song. For example, in the audience suggestions, we used ‘battle scenes’, ‘shots of the band playing’, and ‘something related to history’. From all of the feedback we received for this question, we actually managed to cover every point we were given, which reassured us that the idea we had was as good as we could get.
·
What music videos have stood out for you in the past?
OK Go's videos are
amazing - they are all so unique and interesting, as well as fitting in with
the music.
Rammstien - Mein Land, Marilyn Manson - Tainted Love, or Obey the Beard by Psychostick
Any video by the Gorillaz, OK Go! And Take On Me by Ah-Ha!
I don't really watch many music videos, but Twenty One Pilots release some good music videos.
What
did we learn from this?
After hearing these suggestions of good quality music videos, we decided to research some of these videos to find out why there were so successful and what conventions they did/did not follow that brought them this success. We later decided that some of the stereotypes of a good music video e.g. a story, were vital in order to make a music video successful, so we began to develop our idea around this.
·
What do you think of our main idea?
I think it’s a very good idea and if done well could really get you a good grade!
I think it’s a brilliant idea and fits well with the music, the ending will be great if done right!
It sounds like a very good concept, and the name of the song and the genre of music fit together very well with the idea.
I think it's a really different and clever
idea. It’s good that you'll end watching it with a different perspective to how
you started watching it.
What
did we learn from this?
We were truly grateful for the positive
feedback we received about our idea. People generally thought that the choice
of song and the idea went together very successfully, which made us feel
confident that our product was going to seem more ‘whole’ than if we had used a
different idea for the song, or a different song for the idea. They also seemed
positive about the change at the end of the video. Saying that it will be
‘great if done right’.
ROUGH CUT feedback
·
What do you think of our rough cut video?
It's very well shot and edited, I liked it a lot!
I like the slow motion shots and the quick cut editing, I think you've done a brilliant job for a rough cut!
I really liked the shot where the axe comes down on the camera, and it’s a different location to what many media students have chosen to film in.
It was a really well shot and well worked video! The actors you brought in were amazing and it fitted well with the genre of the song.
What
did we learn from this?
Generally, the feedback we received was positive, which was very encouraging as we showed it mainly to people within our target audience. As well as this, The Darkness themselves commented on the video saying that it was ‘pretty great’, and that the location was ‘ideal for the song’. This made us very confident in continuing with our video.
·
In what ways would you improve how the rough cut was
edited?
I didn't like the turbines in the background, but I do like your idea of them purposely being there to subtly show that what you are watching isn't real. But personally, if I didn't know this fact, I would try and change that.
There were a couple of shots used more than once that need to be changed, apart from that I couldn't find a flaw!
I think you could at a few faster paced shots to increase the drama of the battle.
There are a few shots that are the same, so I would edit those out. Apart from that it’s perfect!
What
did we learn from this?
Firstly we decided what we were going to do about the turbines. We decided, as a group, that we would leave them in. This is because it shows that even though the children are using their imagination, they are not yet fully developed/mature, so even their imagination has limitations. With the comment about repeating shots, we were aware this would be mentioned as the shots were only put in as fillers until we decided what footage was going to fill in the gaps, but it was good that these were pointed out by people as it suggests that they were captivated by the video. We then had to make decisions about the speed of some of the shots. This is because some people commented saying that there needed to be a few longer shots, but others decided that some of the shots were too boring and so needed to be edited to be more exciting and more jumpy. We decided to settle on a mix. With some shots, we would use fast paced quick cuts to make the video exciting, but with the opening shots and some wider shots, we would make the clips longer to emphasize on the length of the battle.
·
The next part we want to have children re-enacting what
you've just seen to show that it was all their imagination. How would you go
about filming this?
I would fade in from the warrior on the ground to the other kid on the ground, and then have them fight but less dramatic than the actual battle.
I would have a similar style to what you filmed except have it at a much slower pace, and I would have whoever calls the children in for tea/end of break time turn around and have a sword showing on his back to get the audience to think even more.
The shots need to be longer in length so that it is less dramatic than the actual battle.
I would have it in a different location to where you first filmed it, like a school playground or in a garden. Have the children pretend fighting with cardboard and plastic swords to make it like they are really pretending.
What
did we learn from this?
From
this feedback, we decided that the final part to the video would take place in
a garden of a house, presumably of one of the children. A parent would then
come out to the garden and tell the kids to come indoors for dinner, and the
children would run indoors as the video fades out to end. We also wanted to
make sure some of the shots were longer than in the Viking scenes as people
said that this will make the children fighting seem less fast paced, less
professional, and more like children. Therefore, we only used a limited number
of shots for these scenes, and the camera was always stationary.
ANCILLARY TASKS feedback
·
POSTER
*INSERT PHOTO OF FINISHED POSTER*
Most responses said that people liked the image
used in the poster and thought that it suited the genre of the music (rock and
roll) well. They also said that they liked the layout of the poster and
that the simple design looked professional and cool. It was also said that the
use of social media advertising was good as it directly targets the younger
audience of the product.
A common negative response that we got for
the poster said that it looked a little dark and dull and that
ideally it needed to be made lighter to look more appealing and eye-catching.
What
did we learn from this?
From
this, we learnt that we should always go to audience feedback before finalizing
a product. This is because there were certain things, like the positioning of
the children on the poster, and the brightness of the image, that the audience
did not like, but that we did not notice ourselves. These improvements made a
large difference to the way that we worked on the digipak, as we knew we should
get as much audience research as we could along the way. However, on a more
positive note, many people seemed to like the poster, saying that it was
fitting for the genre and very complementary to the digipak and the video. We
were very happy with these comments as they assured us that we were on our way
to creating a complete product that works well with all its ancillary
components.
·
DIGIPAK
*INSERT PHOTO OF DIGIPAK*
Many of the responses for our digipak said that
overall they liked the design and layout, especially the use of a shield for
the background of the jewel case. Responses also said that they liked the use
of fonts in the designs and they also liked the fact that we the bands logo and
also showed recognition to the re-enactment group that was used in the
production of the music video. It was also said that there was suitable imagery
used throughout the digipak design and that it suited the genre of the music
video well. Some responses also said that they liked the idea that the front
cover and the back cover were one continuous image, rather than having two
separate images for each.
A criticism of our digipak design was that in
some places it looked a bit 'busy' and that we should consider removing some
logos or fonts to create more space within the design.
What
did we learn from this?
Like with the poster, we missed some things out that the feedback was able to help us with. The main thing that was commented on here was that the image was too ‘busy’, and that album/digipak covers are normally simpler. To change this, we removed some of the unnecessary parts of the album cover, including the band members on the back, and some logos on the front. This made the cover easier on the eye, and the audience were much happier with it after these improvements were made.
FINAL CUT feedback
We showed a room of 13 people (who fit in our
target audience) the final cut of our video, and asked for feedback on it.
Positive feedback
·
‘Music
works really well with plot line’
·
‘Good
colour correction’
·
‘The
end makes it all tie in’
·
‘In
time with music’
·
‘The
ending is so good, like a major plot twist bringing it all together’
·
‘Great
use on mise-en-scene’
·
‘Love
the ending’
·
‘I
like the re-enactment group’
·
‘original
and creative’
·
‘cute
ending’
·
‘I
like the overlaying shot’
·
‘the
ending is good’
·
‘good
use of editing to create a sense of disorientation’
·
‘Interesting
use of mise-en-scene with characters and costumes.
·
‘an
enthusiastic singer, helps with the overall song theme’
What did we learn from this?
We
were very happy with these comments. They made us feel very happy about the
media product that we created, and it showed us which parts were done
successfully, and would be done again if we were to do the project again.
Considering it was a very last minute decision, we were also very happy about
the positive comments we received in regards to the lip-syncing pieces.
The
most commonly raised point in the whole of the final cut audience research was
that the ending was a ‘good’, ‘cute’, ‘major plot twist’. This is exactly the
kind of feedback we were hoping we would receive for this ending, and it made
us feel better about the final outcome of our product, as it was able to meet
the requirements and the opinions of the target audience.
Negative Feedback
·
‘A
little repetitive in the battle’
·
‘Some
shots are messy’
·
‘don’t
like the live performance’
·
‘lip-syncing
is slightly out at the beginning’
·
‘the black and white doesn’t go in my opinion’
What
did we learn from this?
As
much as it is never great to receive negative feedback, this was welcomed as it
enabled us to see which parts of our music video were not as successful as we
may have thought they were. The most commonly raised point was about the lip
syncing being a little bit out of time, and other points saying that they ‘did
not like’ some parts. But I think these were just down to opinion as while some
people agreed on one thing, they disagreed on another.
Overall,
we were very happy whenever we received audience research, as it allowed us to
see how we were progressing. Receiving audience feedback is very important with
media products as the way in which you act upon these comments can be the
decider on how successful your media product is.
Friday, 4 March 2016
Evaluation Question 2 PREP
How effective is the combination of your main product and your ancillary tasks?
Plan:
Plan:
Evaluation Question 2
How effective is the combination of your main
product and your ancillary tasks?
PLANNING FOR PODCAST
----------------------------------------------
To prepare for this question, I wrote out the following notes that the group and I will use for influence of what to say during the podcast.
Explain the
importance in advertising in being able to connect an audience to ancillary
tasks and make them refer to a main product when seeing these products.
Types of
advertising:
·
Trailers in films
·
Posters
·
Youtube
·
Social media
Talk about how
we researched into existing ancillary tasks and advertising methods (SHOW
IMAGES OF THESE), and how the things that we have learnt from these were put
into use in the planning of the ancillary tasks.
A common theme
is good within a range of products. Helps to create a brand/association between
the products.
THE POSTER
A poster is by far
one of the most successful pieces of advertising. It shows, usually in a large
format, features of the main task which helps to captivate the audience. (SHOW
PROFESSIONAL EXAMPLES).
The stereotypes
of a poster include: NAME THEM, EXPLAIN
We decided to
use more/less of these stereotypes because…. Explain etc.
From audience
research into these stereotypes, we decided that we would need one thing to be
apparent across all our products… the band logo. Explain.
Our poster
connects to our music video by….
Song, photo, theme,
etc.
To improve our
poster…
Quote audience
research ‘image needs to be lighter’ etc.
THE DIGIPAK
Next, we had
to create a digipak for our video. This would consist of a cd front, back, and
inside, with some of the stereotypes of a digipak. These stereotypes include… logo, image of artist or an album cover image, text
on back (explain), and simple things eg barcode, other logos etc.
The
stereotypes that we decided to use were… logo, album cover image, text on back
(explain), and simple things eg barcode, other logos etc.
The digipak
relates to the poster by… logo, images, fonts, themes, colours, etc.
The digipak
relates to the main product by... images, theme. We chose to use photos of the
Vikings rather than photos of the band to relate the digipak and the poster to
the main task, and create an association between these products. Explain more
OVERALL
The
combination of all these tasks is very successful with many people from the
audience research making comments such as ‘it works with the theme’, and ‘it
all suits the video’. We are happy with these comments because…
We wanted to
make sure there was a clear connection between these ancillary tasks because…
it connects an audience to the products, it makes the brand stronger, and it
allows a variety of ways for the product to be communicated.
Wednesday, 2 March 2016
Evaluation Question 1 PREP
In what ways does your media product use, develop, or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
PLANNING FOR VIDEO
----------------------------------------------
To prepare for this question, I created the following plan:
All
in note form, use the following to prompt ideas but discuss previously created
ideas and talk about products.
Conventions
of a music video:- Close ups and mid shots – for emotion
- Long shots during a story – to set the scene
- Following shots and tilts – more exciting
- Jumpy cuts and fast editing – theme
- Black and white filters, other filters – image
- Artificial lighting – theme
- Close ups and mid shots – explain when/why
- Long shots to set scenes, close ups for anger/emotion - explain when/why
- Tilted shots with band – excitement - explain when/why
- Following shots of battle scenes – 1 character followed - explain when/why
- Fast paced editing for action style, jumpy - explain when/why
- Black and white shots in studio - explain when/why
- Props, swords, toys, etc. - explain when/why
- No following shots of band/singer - explain when/why
- No purposeful artificial lighting - explain when/why
Conventions
of a rock genre music video:
- A story with a meaning - explain when/why
- Good mise-en-scene - explain when/why
- Action, fast paced movements, timed with the music - explain when/why
- A band in a studio - explain when/why
- All mise-en-scene is strong and related - explain when/why
- Fast paced and well timed shots - explain when/why
- No full band shown - explain when/why
Conclusion – summary, recap points
Saturday, 20 February 2016
Audience feedback: Final cut
To get feedback on our final cut, we sat 13 people, within our target audience, in a room together and showed them our video. They were each given a sheet with the examiners mark scheme and a comments section, and then we asked them to complete the sheet after watching the video. Some of the comments we received were:
·
‘Music
works really well with plot line’
·
‘Good
colour correction’
·
‘The
end makes it all tie in’
·
‘In
time with music’
·
‘The
ending is so good, like a major plot twist bringing it all together’
·
‘Great
use on mise-en-scene’
·
‘Love
the ending’
·
‘I
like the re-enactment group’
·
‘original
and creative’
·
‘cute
ending’
·
‘I
like the overlaying shot’
·
‘the
ending is good’
·
‘good
use of editing to create a sense of disorientation’
·
‘Interesting
use of mise-en-scene with characters and costumes.
·
‘A
little repetitive in the battle’
·
‘Some
shots are messy’
·
‘don’t
like the live performance’
·
‘lip-syncing
is slightly out at the beginning’
·
‘an
enthusiastic singer, helps with the overall song theme’
·
‘the
black and white doesn’t go in my opinion’
We were quite happy with the amount of positive feedback that we received, and we were able to reflect upon the not so positive comments, to know how we would be able to improve our video if we were to do the project again.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
